 |
|  |  |  |  |
American Government,
Ninth Edition
James Q. Wilson
John J. DiIulio, Jr., University of Pennsylvania
|  |  |
 |  | Study Outline
Chapter 22:
Who Governs? To What Ends?
- Introduction
- Assumption the president and Congress are to address social and economic
problems
- Limited concern of government as recently as the Eisenhower administration
- The Founders and the role of the federal government
- Constitutional hurdles to effective federal action
- Separation of powers and checks and balances
- Federalism
- Bicameralism
- Restraints on the growth of government
- For first 150 years government grew slowly
- Supreme Court defined government authority narrowly
- Popular opinion supported a limited governmental role
- The political system was designed to limit government
- System limiting government makes it difficult to abolish programs
- Under Reagan spending increased for many programs
- Bush has also proposed programs that would increase spending
- Relaxing the Restraints
- Changes in Constitutional interpretation
- Bill of Rights incorporated to the states
- Special protection of property rights reduced, business regulation increased
- Congress allowed to give broad discretionary powers to administrative agencies
- Changes in public opinion
- Public demand for government action during Great Depression
- Opinions of political elites changed even faster
- Some programs have been popular with the masses
- Changes in the distribution of political resources
- Number and variety of interest groups have increased
- Funds from organization pursuing causes have grown
- Greater access to the federal courts
- Technological advances have enhanced the power to communicate ideas
- The Old System v. the New System
- Consequences of activist government
- Need to assess costs and benefits of programs
- General political consequences of the enlarged scope of activity
- Bureaucratization of all organizations
- Rise of competing policies
- Less control by the electorate through the decline of parties and turnout
and of public confidence
- Greater risk of government failure
- The influence of structure
- Parliamentary model; if adopted here, would do the following:
- Fewer legislative restraints on the executive
- More bureaucratic centralization
- Less citizen participation to challenge or block policies
- Higher taxes and more secrecy
- U.S. model
- More local authority
- Greater citizen participation
- The influence of ideas
- Preoccupation with rights
- Assumption that affected groups have a right to participate in policy formation
- Willingness to resort to courts
- Effects of rights on government functions
- Harder to make government decisions
- More red tape
- Elite opinion influences which rights have priority
- Favors freedom of expression over management of property
- Mass opinion less committed to freedom of expression
- Freedom versus equality an enduring tension
- Advantages of freedom are remote
- Advantages of equality are obvious
- Fragmentation of political system increases role of ideas
- Widespread enthusiasm for an idea can lead to rapid adoption of new programs
- Competing ideas make change difficult; change today may require the persuading
of thousands of special interests
- Fundamental challenge: to restore confidence in the legitimacy of government
itself
|  |
|  |
|
|
|