Houghton Mifflin Textbook - - Textbook Home Page
Can You Explain Why?
Chapter Outlines
Internet Exercises
Talking Politics
Weblinks
IDEAlog
Author Weblinks
ACE Practice Tests
Flashcards
Political SourceNet
Crosstabs
U.S. Interactive Map
Textbook Site for:
The Challenge of Democracy
,
Eighth Edition
Kenneth Janda, Northwestern University
Jeffrey M. Berry, Tufts University
Jerry Goldman, Northwestern University
Internet Exercises
Chapter Sixteen: Equality and Civil Rights
Education, civil rights, and students with disabilities
The Oyez Project at Northwestern University is the most comprehensive multimedia database on the U.S. Supreme Court. It is located on the internet at
http://www.oyez.org/oyez/frontpage
. Use the Oyez site's search function to locate the case of Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F. and Charlene F. (1999). In this case the Court addressed the issue of whether a school district is legally obligated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to provide one-on-one care to a disabled student. Listen to the announcement of the Court's opinion in this case, which was read by Justice Stevens. Why was the distinction between "related services" and "medical services" so crucial in the Court's decision in this case? How did the Court's decision uphold the value of equality?
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), known as "Bakke" for short, is one of the most significant U.S. Supreme Court decisions on the question of affirmative action in university admissions. Audio of the announcement of the Court's opinion is available on the internet from The Oyez Project's web site. Go to the Oyez site,
http://www.oyez.org/oyez/frontpage
, and find the Bakke decision. Activate the Real Audio announcement of the Court's opinion with transcript to listen to (and read along with) excerpts of the remarks from the following Justices: Stevens (13:15 - 20:30) and Blackmun (39:45 - 41:15 and 44:00 - 50:20). Aside from their disagreement in the overall outcome, Stevens and Blackmun approached this case in fundamentally different ways. What was so different about how they reached their respective decisions?
Site Map
|
Partners
|
Press Releases
|
Company Home
|
Contact Us
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms and Conditions of Use
,
Privacy Statement
, and
Trademark Information