InstructorsStudentsReviewersAuthorsBooksellers Contact Us
image
  DisciplineHome
 ResourceHome
 
 
 
 Bookstore
United States Resource Center


Primary Sources


Introduction | Questions to Consider | Source


Susan LaFollette on Marriage and Divorce
(1929)
Susan LaFollette

Introduction
Before answering the following questions about this document, you will want to review in your text American attitudes toward divorce in the early part of this century. Think about how society's views of divorce have changed over time and how some issues have remained the same.

Questions to Consider
  1. According to LaFollette, why was divorce becoming more generally accepted in the 1920s?

  2. Do you agree with LaFollette's assertion? Why or why not?

  3. What does the author's opinion tell us about the changing roles of husbands and wives in the 1920s?

  4. Do you think LaFollette's opinion is applicable to today's social culture? Why or why not?



Source
. . . The general acceptance of the idea of divorce at present is in great measure the result of woman's growing demand for reciprocity in her relations with men, and her refusal to be owned either economically or sexually. It may be regarded as an aspect of her general declaration of independence. That there are women who still make a profession of being owned, either in or out of wedlock, does not invalidate the general truth that as women have found themselves in a position to make their demands effective, they have insisted upon elevating marriage to a higher moral plane. Divorce has been one of the means to this end. No doubt it is a means often abused; but no institution has been more often abused by unscrupulous people than that of marriage, and no one ever thought the abuse an argument against the institution. It is largely due to the possibility of divorce that marriage now tends to be regarded as a voluntary partnership involving equal economic and spiritual obligations on both sides, and justly to be dissolved when those obligations have been violated by either party or have become onerous to either or to both. . . .



BORDER=0
BORDER="0"