Louisa May Alcott (1832-1888)
Contributing Editor: Elizabeth Keyser
Classroom Issues and Strategies
"Actress," the third chapter of Louisa May Alcott's novel
Work, provides an ideal introduction to the author, for throughout
her career Alcott was concerned with woman as actress--both on and off
stage. Students, however, may be perplexed as to why Christie equates acting
first with rebellion, then with the loss of her womanliness. Thus they
need to understand that professional acting in Alcott's day placed women
beyond the pale of respectable society. Even as amateur theatricals were
becoming a staple of Victorian parlor entertainment, the exposure of women
to public view was still thought to compromise their innocence, purity,
and, in a word, virtue. But Alcott's contemporaries may also have believed
that the element of duplicity involved in acting was incompatible with
their ideal of woman as simple, artless, without guile. This disjunction
between woman and actress is suggested by the title of a reprinted Alcott
sensation story, "LaJeune: or, Actress and Woman" (one of four
stories with actress heroines in
Freaks of Genius). The male narrator
mistrusts the brilliant actress "LaJeune," but though he proves
her vaunted youth a fraud, he finds it perpetrated for the sake of her
invalid husband, not, as he suspected, for her opium-eating or gambling
habit. Like "LaJeune," Alcott's actress stories imply that a
woman can preserve her integrity while pursuing a public career but that
a patriarchal society forces women to become actresses in their private
lives. Thus, Judith Fetterley has observed of Jean Muir, the professional
actress turned governess in Alcott's best-known sensation story, "Behind
a Mask," that in order to analyze the needs of every person in the
house, Muir must be supremely conscious. Ironically, therefore, the innocence,
simplicity, even stupidity imputed to her is in fact incompatible with
her role (6).
Some of Alcott's heroines, like Christie Devon, Jean Muir, and LaJeune,
are professional actresses, but the heroines of other authors, such as
Jane Austen, Charlotte Brontė, and
Edith
Wharton, appear only in amateur theatricals or
tableaux vivants.
Sylvia Yule, the heroine of Alcott's first novel,
Moods, enacts
scenes from Shakespeare for male friends (as Christie later does in
Work)
and, like Jo March in
Little Women, revels in male roles, giving
vent to feelings she cannot otherwise express. Similarly, Gladys, the angelic
heroine of Alcott's full-length sensation novel,
A Modern Mephistopheles,
suggests the complexity of women's nature, its intellectual and emotional
range, by playing the villainous Vivien from Tennyson's
Idylls of the
King. But even entirely off-stage Alcott's heroines strike poses and
assume disguises, play roles and contrive scenes. They position themselves
against becoming backdrops, then feign ignorance of a man's approach; they
arrange their hair so as to conceal their facial expressions; they take
opium so as to appear more radiant; they take still more so as to appear
passionless. They affect to cry and then pretend to attempt in vain to
conceal the tears. The pervasiveness of stagecraft in Alcott's fiction--the
extent to which her heroines don masks and play roles--has led some critics
to suspect the author of a similar duplicity. Fetterley and others see
Alcott's persona as Aunt Jo, the author of
Little Women and its
sequels, as a kind of mask. Angela Estes and Kathleen Lant read
Little
Women as a melodrama in which the author whisks Jo from the stage and
replaces her with Beth, confident that her readers will not detect the
masquerade. Rena Sanderson and others argue that Alcott, in having the
hero of
A Modern Mephistopheles confess to having passed off another's
works as his own, confesses to her own literary hoax.
The male narrator of Alcott's story "A Double Tragedy" asserts
that "an actor learns to live a double life." So, too, according
to Alcott's fiction, do women--and women authors. In the selection "Actress,"
Christie comes to grief when, as an actress, she steps from the frame in
which she impersonates another actress, who in turn impersonates a portrait
of herself. Thus Alcott, by having Christie play Peg Woffington in Charles
Reade's
Masks and Faces, signifies the entrapment of women in multiple
roles and the difficulty of escaping them without injury.
Major Themes, Historical Perspectives, and Personal Issues
In "Actress" we find that the professional actress acquires
a measure of power and independence, but that the theater in many ways
mirrors larger society. The chapter opens with Christie "resolving
not to be a slave to anybody." And by becoming "Queen of the
Amazons," she seems to have escaped that subservient condition. Further,
in becoming an actress, Christie continues to declare her independence
to Uncle Enos. At the thought of his disapproval "a delicious sense
of freedom pervaded her soul, and the old defiant spirit seemed to rise
up within her." Yet to obtain her role, Christie must first subject
herself to dehumanizing scrutiny. In fact, her manager's examination reminds
us of the slave market scenes in
Uncle Tom's Cabin. And her Amazon
troupe is described as "a most forlorn band of warriors . . . afraid
to speak, lest they should infringe some rule." Far from being true
Amazons, capable of terrorizing their male enemies, the show girls cower
in terror of male authority. Christie recovers some of her enthusiasm on
opening night, but the narrator tells us that her warlike trappings are
"poor counterfeit." Even the "grand tableau," in which
the martial queen stands triumphantly over the princess she has rescued,
seems not so much a reversal of as a variation on the familiar male script.
Yet at the end of the chapter, Christie effects a genuine rescue, thereby
anticipating her role later in
Work as what Estes and Lant have
called the "Feminist Redeemer" or "Female Christ."
Significant Form, Style, or Artistic Conventions
While a number of critics have recognized the importance of the drama
in Alcott's life and art, not all of them view her use of it as consistently
subversive. As early as 1943 Madeleine Stern, in "Louisa Alcott, Trouper,"
provided an account of Alcott's youthful dramatic activities and perceived
that both her sensation and her autobiographical fiction were indebted
to them. Since then Sharon O'Brien and Karen Halttunen (among others) have
discussed Alcott's adolescent melodramas: O'Brien sees them foreshadowing
Alcott's inability to reconcile "the energetic, assertive self represented
by her tomboy period with an adult female identity"(365); Halttunen
views them as subverting her father's use of allegorical drama "to
control every aspect of self-expression" (237-38).
Comparisons, Contrasts, Connections
Alcott's use of theatricals can be fruitfully compared to that of Jane
Austen in
Mansfield Park, Charlotte Brontė in
Jane Eyre
and Villette, and
Edith
Wharton in
The House of Mirth. Interesting comparisons might
also be drawn between Christie's experience as a professional actress and
that of
Dreiser's Carrie.
Christie as an artist can also be compared to
Elizabeth
Stuart Phelps's Avis. While Christie does not have Avis's strong sense
of vocation, she eventually finds "a never-failing excitement in her
attempts to reach the standard of perfection she had set up for herself."
Just as Avis feels torn between the conflicting demands of her art and
family, so Christie feels torn between the gratification she derives from
individual achievement and the qualities that would enable her to subordinate
her own needs to another's. Finally, Christie's sense of sisterly solidarity,
to which she finally sacrifices her career, links her with the female characters
and communities created by
Sarah
Orne Jewett and
Mary
E. Wilkins Freeman.
Bibliography
Alcott, Louisa May. "Behind a Mask." In
Alternative Alcott,
edited by Elaine Showalter, 383-441. American Women Writers Series. New
Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1988.
--. "A Double Tragedy. An Actor's Story." In
The Double
Life: Newly Discovered Thrillers of Louisa May Alcott, edited by Madeleine
B. Stern, Joel Myerson, and Daniel Shealy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1988.
--.
Freaks of Genius: Unknown Thrillers of Louisa May Alcott,
edited by Daniel Shealy, Madeleine B. Stern, and Joel Myerson. New York:
Greenwood, 1991.
--.
Work: A Story of Experience. "Introduction" by
Sarah Elbert. New York: Schocken, 1977.
Auerbach, Nina. "Afterword." In
Little Women. New York:
Bantam, 1983.
Bedell, Jeanne F. "A Necessary Mask: The Sensation Fiction of Louisa
May Alcott."
Missouri Philological Association Publications
5 (1980): 8-14.
Estes, Angela M. and Kathleen Margaret Lant. "The Feminist Redeemer:
Louisa May Alcott's Creation of the Female Christ in Work."
Christianity
and Literature 40 (1991): 223-53.
--. "Dismembering the Text: The Horror of Louisa May Alcott's
Little
Women."
Children's Literature 17 (1989): 98-123.
Fetterley, Judith. "Impersonating 'Little Women': The Radicalism
of Alcott's
Behind a Mask." Women's Studies 10 (1983): 1-14.
Halttunen, Karen. "The Domestic Drama of Louisa May Alcott."
Feminist Studies 10 (1984): 232-54.
Harris, Susan K. "Narrative Control and Thematic Radicalism in
Work and
The Silent Partner." In
19th-Century American
Women's Novels: Interpretive Strategies, 173-96. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1990.
Keyser, Elozabeth Lennoz.
Whispers in the Dark: The Fiction of Louisa
May Alcott. Knoxville: Universty of Tennessee Press, 1993.
Keyser, Elizabeth Lennox. "'The Most Beautiful Things in All the
World'? Families in
Little Women." In
Stories and Society:
Children's Literature in its Social Context, edited by Dennis Butts,
50-64. London: Macmillan, 1992.
Langland, Elizabeth. "Female Stories of Experience: Alcott's
Little
Women in Light of
Work."
The Voyage In: Fiction of Female
Development, edited by Elizabeth Abel, Marianne Hirsch, and Elizabeth
Langland, 112-27. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1983.
Little Women and the Feminist Imagination, edited by Beverly
Lyon Clark and Janice M. Alberghene. New York: Garland, 1997.
Murphy, Ann B. "The Borders of Ethical, Erotic, and Artistic Possibilities
in
Little Women."
Signs 15 (1990): 562-85.
O'Brien, Sharon. "Tomboyism and Adolescent Conflict: Three Nineteenth-Century
Case Studies." In
Women's Being, Women's Place: Female Identity
and Vocation in American History, Boston: G. K. Hall, 1979: 351-72.
Rigsby, Mary, "'So Like Women!': Louisa May Alcott's
Work
and the Ideology of Relations." In
Redefining the Political Novel:
American Women Writers, 1791-1901, edited by Susan K. Harris. Knoxville,
University of Tennessee Press, 1995.
Sanderson, Rena. "
A Modern Mephistopheles: Louisa May Alcott's
Exorcism of Patriarchy."
American Transcendental Quarterly
5 (1991): 41-55.
Widdicombe, Toby. "A 'Declaration of Independence': Alcott's
Work
as Transcendental Manifesto."
ESQ 38 (1992): 207-29.
Yellin, Jean Fagan. "From
Success to Experience: Louisa
May Alcott's
Work."
Massachusetts Review 21 (1980):
527-39.